Run macOS on QEMU/KVM. This README documents the new method to install macOS. This step may need to be adapted for your Linux distribution.
Table of contents
- Recommended Posts
- macos - How to enable KVM on a Mac for Qemu? - Stack Overflow
- Running macOS as guest in kvm.
I assume the same is possible with Player for Linux, but didn't actually look for that myself. Then you just have to obtain an appropriate VM image also easily found via Google or build your own. I was curious so tested this for a laugh. Performance was perfectly decent for non-graphical apps. I was just playing with it so I never tried logging in with an Apple ID or anything more complicated like enabling 3d acceleration in the VM and seeing what performance would be like for graphical applications , so no idea how all that works.
I'm sure Google will tell you if you ask it nicely. I've done this, albeit on Mac hardware on a regular basis. VMWare support is Running on non-Apple hardware will give you a couple of additional hoops to jump through, but from what I've read it will work. Just make sure you consider your software needs. Some software won't run properly in a VM, even on Apple hardware. For most things though, should work reasonably well.
If I truly had no other options I'd consider it, but it's not a great experience. I'm on El Cap on Mid 27" iMac 2. This is so I can test it before deciding if it's worthwhile to upgrade or not. Found this.. I toyed with the idea of funding a small side-project to build this, but I couldn't make the economics work.
- Navigation menu?
- kraxel's news.
- Configuring VM acceleration;
- ssl duende native mac download.
- Kernel-based Virtual Machine?
This impacts lots of apps that just won't run, or won't run well, and it completely sucks. It would open up the door to a lot of IT and Development use-cases for virtual machines of MacOS that are currently closed Why not buy or use an external storage to test out new versions of the OS? I do this every time they do a new release.
Test it out and decide if moving up is worth it. I do this regularly. I've done it on Thinkpads, and I'm doing it currently on my Dell Latitude Updates to Mac OS can break things, but they are easy to fix again, and unlike a Hackintosh, you have snapshots to rollback to in case you've borken something. Stuff like iMessages and Continuity won't work properly. You'll need to edit a couple VirtualBox config files simple to do, just a couple of plain text files that you add a couple lines to to enable Mac support on non-Mac hardware. I'd heartily recommend it for iOS development. I actually prefer it to my actual, real-life Mac a MBP 13" , because even with a VM and a Linux host running simulatenously, and both being pushed hard, I still get better battery life on my Dell.
macos - How to enable KVM on a Mac for Qemu? - Stack Overflow
My host has been Kubuntu. It's not that hard, and yes if you pick parts closest to a real Mac it does make it easier. I am on my second Hackintosh. The first one I kinda went in a little blind, and picked a CPU which wasn't really supported by Apple. It worked just fine and the community had lots of guides to help make it work. It didn't prevent any issues since it the same architecture and worked flawlessly. I also have a VM of OP sounds like a candidate for a Hackintosh.
I won't ever go back to genuine Apple for a desktop unless they totally shutdown Hackintosh's. Parallels doesn't sell Windows hypervisor software, so unless it supports exporting to OVA a quick Google search says no or some other non-Parallels format, you're SOL. Since out of box Workstation on Windows and Linux doesn't support macOS guests I'm wondering if that menu path works on those systems. Ah, I see what you are saying.
The Tools disc image can be found on VMWare's website here. For example, here are the Tools image for v The appropriate Mac OS version is called "darwin". You have to tell Player to go download the VMware tools packages, if I remember correctly. But my notes from the testing don't mention any issues with tools installation. And once installed you get the normal auto-resolution-adjustment and other stuff you'd expect from fully integrated VMware tools experience.
ClarkGoble wrote: steeple wrote: it would sure be useful for all those 32bit apps tho, loosing quicktime pro is going to bite Keeping a copy of Snow Leopard around in a VM can be useful for old apps. I've used it maaaaaybe half a dozen times across two or three years just to crack open some old piece of software for some reason. It's a super useful tool when I actually need it, but that's obviously not that often. Wow this thread. I do a command-f for pci or passthrough and no results. Come on folks. In turn if you're getting an Intel setup that is not Xeon then you'd want to double check that Intel likes to segregate functionality in odd ways sometimes , but if you're looking for something higher performance that'd be a given anyway.
There is a minimal performance hit couple of percent but macOS virtualized can still slaughter any Mac regardless because Apple just doesn't offer any really high powered hardware at all anymore. The extra complexity does at least also offer the same added advantages you'd get from a hypervisor setup anyway, including ease of LOM, hardware abstraction, trivial rollbacks if something goes wrong, etc. Also means your core system can still be fully supported like normal depending on OEM. So if you're up for it it's not like you just get better performance and some insulation from Apple forgetting about the Mac for random intervals.
Whether it's worth it or not is subjective. In terms of hardware just remember that using PCIe passthrough is exposing something to the OS natively so you still have to worry about basic compatibility same as if it was just installed directly on a cMP or something. An Nvidia GPU will still need the web drivers installed for example. And even many virtualized interfaces still need to have internal driver support in a way that macOS will understand. It does at least free you from needing to worry about EFI flashing, and somethings like storage and network interfaces are of course virtualized easily.
It definitely isn't turnkey yet, and some setups I'd like to try out remain works in progress for a type-2 I'd prefer FreeBSD to Linux so I'd love to just be able to use bhyve and all the native ZFS goodness as well, but bhyve itself is simply much less mature then a lot of other solutions period. Perhaps after 9 years Apple will really make a good Mac Pro once again and make this a non-issue.
But it's not something that's at all a bad idea to keep an eye on. Longer term in particular it's a really promising potential escape valve. Just came across this topic and thought I'd chime in. I find this setup preferable to a bare metal Hackintosh as it's much easier to backup should something go wrong, although so far, I've had no issues. Late to my own party, but thanks for this everyone, very helpful. This is very encouraging - sounds like almost exactly what I want to do. Have you had any of the issues mentioned above i.
Mac App Store not registering your video card as supported for some apps? This thread has me thinking. But I just built a new server Seems like if it works, the worst case might be needing to buy a solid GPU for it. Cheaper than buying a whole Mac Pro, and one less box in the office isn't a bad thing. This might be fixable. I just got a later model Apple keyboard that works fine with it, so this is fixed. What do I use the VM for? TM goes on half of the 4TB disk I mentioned above. Might change to CCC at some point. Means MacBooks and idevices in my house can pull down updates, family photos and videos etc lightning fast.
Ars Macintoshian people, I have a question.
At the moment, I have a login account for each one of my family members on the VM High Sierra and leave it logged into all of them all the time, and hope it keeps up with downloading their ICloud files. Is there a better way of doing it? Ps a tip on reducing power usage for the VM.
Just curious, are you passing the GPU through directly as described by other posters? Listen now.
Running macOS as guest in kvm.
Learn more. Asked 6 years, 7 months ago.
Active 5 years, 10 months ago. Viewed 18k times. Krishna Krishna 2 2 gold badges 3 3 silver badges 13 13 bronze badges. Found this bit of info with an install update you might find helpful - blog. JeffClayton That's a different "kvm" than the question was asking about. It's a. NET version manager, which has since been renamed to "dnvm". It didn't exist yet when this question was asked, and has no relation to Linux KVM virtualization. Hmm, interesting - did not know there was another kvm for linux out there in the past than the major one for virtualization. Thanks for the update.
The question has little to no information about the product, just a desire to convert one linux app to a version for a non-linux architecture. Your approach is incorrect.